An International Multicenter Cohort Study on Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators for the Treatment of Symptomatic Children with Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Avani Lamba
  • Thomas M Roston
  • Puck J Peltenburg
  • Dania Kallas
  • Sonia Franciosi
  • Krystien V V Lieve
  • Prince J Kannankeril
  • Minoru Horie
  • Seiko Ohno
  • Ramon Brugada
  • Takeshi Aiba
  • Peter Fischbach
  • Linda Knight
  • Jan Till
  • Sit-Yee Kwok
  • Vincent Probst
  • David Backhoff
  • Martin J LaPage
  • Anjan S Batra
  • Fabrizio Drago
  • Kristina Haugaa
  • Andrew D Krahn
  • Tomas Robyns
  • Heikki Swan
  • Terezia Tavacova
  • Joseph Atallah
  • Martin Borggrefe
  • Boris Rudic
  • Georgia Sarquella-Brugada
  • Ehud Chorin
  • Allison Hill
  • Janneke Kammeraad
  • Anna Kamp
  • James Perry
  • Jason D Roberts
  • Svjetlana Tisma-Dupanovic
  • Christopher Semsarian
  • Jonathan R Skinner
  • Isabelle Denjoy
  • Antoine Leenhardt
  • Peter J Schwartz
  • Michael J Ackerman
  • Arthur A M Wilde
  • Christian van der Werf
  • Shubhayan Sanatani

BACKGROUND: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) may cause sudden cardiac death (SCD) despite medical therapy. Therefore, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are commonly advised. However, there are limited data on the outcomes of ICD use in children.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of arrhythmic events in pediatric CPVT patients with and without ICDs.

METHODS: We compared the risk of SCD in RYR2 variant and phenotype positive symptomatic CPVT patients with and without ICDs, who were <19 years of age and had no history of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) at phenotype diagnosis. The primary outcome was SCD; secondary outcomes were composite incidences of SCD, SCA, appropriate ICD shocks, with/without arrhythmic syncope.

RESULTS: The study included 235 patients, 73 (31.1%) with ICDs and 162 (68.9%) without ICDs. Over a median follow-up of 8.0 years (IQR 4.3-13.4), SCD occurred in 7 (3.0%) patients, of which 4 (57.1%) were non-compliant with medications and none had an ICD. ICD patients had a higher risk of both secondary composite outcomes (without syncope: HR 5.85 (CI 3.40-10.09); p<0.0001; with syncope: HR 2.55 (CI 1.50-4.34); p=0.0005). Thirty-one (42.5%) patients with an ICD experienced appropriate shocks, 18 (24.7%) inappropriate shocks, and 21 (28.8%) device-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS: SCD events occurred only in the no ICD group, in those not on optimal medical therapy. ICD patients had a high risk of appropriate and inappropriate shocks, which may be reduced with appropriate device programming. Severe ICD complications were common and risks versus benefits of ICDs need to be considered.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftHeart Rhythm
ISSN1547-5271
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 2024

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

ID: 389849479