Analysis of seized peptide and protein-based doping agents using four complimentary methods: Liquid chromatography coupled with time of flight mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-ultraviolet, Bradford, and immunoassays

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Analysis of seized peptide and protein-based doping agents using four complimentary methods : Liquid chromatography coupled with time of flight mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-ultraviolet, Bradford, and immunoassays. / Høj, Lars Jakobsen; Rasmussen, Brian Schou; Dalsgaard, Petur Weihe; Linnet, Kristian.

I: Drug Testing and Analysis, Bind 13, Nr. 7, 2021, s. 1457-1463.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Høj, LJ, Rasmussen, BS, Dalsgaard, PW & Linnet, K 2021, 'Analysis of seized peptide and protein-based doping agents using four complimentary methods: Liquid chromatography coupled with time of flight mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-ultraviolet, Bradford, and immunoassays', Drug Testing and Analysis, bind 13, nr. 7, s. 1457-1463. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3026

APA

Høj, L. J., Rasmussen, B. S., Dalsgaard, P. W., & Linnet, K. (2021). Analysis of seized peptide and protein-based doping agents using four complimentary methods: Liquid chromatography coupled with time of flight mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-ultraviolet, Bradford, and immunoassays. Drug Testing and Analysis, 13(7), 1457-1463. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3026

Vancouver

Høj LJ, Rasmussen BS, Dalsgaard PW, Linnet K. Analysis of seized peptide and protein-based doping agents using four complimentary methods: Liquid chromatography coupled with time of flight mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-ultraviolet, Bradford, and immunoassays. Drug Testing and Analysis. 2021;13(7):1457-1463. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3026

Author

Høj, Lars Jakobsen ; Rasmussen, Brian Schou ; Dalsgaard, Petur Weihe ; Linnet, Kristian. / Analysis of seized peptide and protein-based doping agents using four complimentary methods : Liquid chromatography coupled with time of flight mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-ultraviolet, Bradford, and immunoassays. I: Drug Testing and Analysis. 2021 ; Bind 13, Nr. 7. s. 1457-1463.

Bibtex

@article{715d0b72df234c6781fc457122df7e72,
title = "Analysis of seized peptide and protein-based doping agents using four complimentary methods: Liquid chromatography coupled with time of flight mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-ultraviolet, Bradford, and immunoassays",
abstract = "Analysis and identification of seized doping-related products are important tasks for customs or forensic laboratories in order to prevent potentially dangerous and illegal compounds to go into circulation. At the Section of Forensic Chemistry in Copenhagen, we have a workflow consisting of four complimentary validated methods to identify common doping-related substances: liquid chromatography-ultraviolet (LC-UV), LC coupled with time of flight mass spectrometry (LC-TOF-MS), the colorimetric Bradford assay, and an immunoassay. The Bradford assay screens for peptide or proteins in the sample, and the immunoassay confirmed human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). LC-UV was carried out with a C4 protein column for identification of peptides and proteins from a standard reference library, based on retention times and ratios between peak areas at 220, 254, and 280 nm. LC-TOF-MS was performed using a C18 column, and identification was based on comparison of the retention time and the accurate mass with those of reference standards. In 2019, we received 36 samples for peptide/protein analysis, all of which were tested using the LC-UV, LC-TOF-MS, and colorimetric method, and samples suspected of containing hCG were confirmed with an immunoassay. We found a total of 15 samples containing an illegal doping substance, 12 samples containing substances not prohibited by the Danish Doping List, and nine samples containing no peptides or proteins. In conclusion, the four complimentary methods constitute a suitable approach for identifying common peptide/protein doping substances in the day-to-day routine of a forensic laboratory, with limited sample preparation and interpretation of data.",
author = "H{\o}j, {Lars Jakobsen} and Rasmussen, {Brian Schou} and Dalsgaard, {Petur Weihe} and Kristian Linnet",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1002/dta.3026",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1457--1463",
journal = "Drug Testing and Analysis",
issn = "1942-7603",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons Ltd",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of seized peptide and protein-based doping agents using four complimentary methods

T2 - Liquid chromatography coupled with time of flight mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-ultraviolet, Bradford, and immunoassays

AU - Høj, Lars Jakobsen

AU - Rasmussen, Brian Schou

AU - Dalsgaard, Petur Weihe

AU - Linnet, Kristian

N1 - © 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Analysis and identification of seized doping-related products are important tasks for customs or forensic laboratories in order to prevent potentially dangerous and illegal compounds to go into circulation. At the Section of Forensic Chemistry in Copenhagen, we have a workflow consisting of four complimentary validated methods to identify common doping-related substances: liquid chromatography-ultraviolet (LC-UV), LC coupled with time of flight mass spectrometry (LC-TOF-MS), the colorimetric Bradford assay, and an immunoassay. The Bradford assay screens for peptide or proteins in the sample, and the immunoassay confirmed human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). LC-UV was carried out with a C4 protein column for identification of peptides and proteins from a standard reference library, based on retention times and ratios between peak areas at 220, 254, and 280 nm. LC-TOF-MS was performed using a C18 column, and identification was based on comparison of the retention time and the accurate mass with those of reference standards. In 2019, we received 36 samples for peptide/protein analysis, all of which were tested using the LC-UV, LC-TOF-MS, and colorimetric method, and samples suspected of containing hCG were confirmed with an immunoassay. We found a total of 15 samples containing an illegal doping substance, 12 samples containing substances not prohibited by the Danish Doping List, and nine samples containing no peptides or proteins. In conclusion, the four complimentary methods constitute a suitable approach for identifying common peptide/protein doping substances in the day-to-day routine of a forensic laboratory, with limited sample preparation and interpretation of data.

AB - Analysis and identification of seized doping-related products are important tasks for customs or forensic laboratories in order to prevent potentially dangerous and illegal compounds to go into circulation. At the Section of Forensic Chemistry in Copenhagen, we have a workflow consisting of four complimentary validated methods to identify common doping-related substances: liquid chromatography-ultraviolet (LC-UV), LC coupled with time of flight mass spectrometry (LC-TOF-MS), the colorimetric Bradford assay, and an immunoassay. The Bradford assay screens for peptide or proteins in the sample, and the immunoassay confirmed human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). LC-UV was carried out with a C4 protein column for identification of peptides and proteins from a standard reference library, based on retention times and ratios between peak areas at 220, 254, and 280 nm. LC-TOF-MS was performed using a C18 column, and identification was based on comparison of the retention time and the accurate mass with those of reference standards. In 2019, we received 36 samples for peptide/protein analysis, all of which were tested using the LC-UV, LC-TOF-MS, and colorimetric method, and samples suspected of containing hCG were confirmed with an immunoassay. We found a total of 15 samples containing an illegal doping substance, 12 samples containing substances not prohibited by the Danish Doping List, and nine samples containing no peptides or proteins. In conclusion, the four complimentary methods constitute a suitable approach for identifying common peptide/protein doping substances in the day-to-day routine of a forensic laboratory, with limited sample preparation and interpretation of data.

U2 - 10.1002/dta.3026

DO - 10.1002/dta.3026

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33686802

VL - 13

SP - 1457

EP - 1463

JO - Drug Testing and Analysis

JF - Drug Testing and Analysis

SN - 1942-7603

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 274122020