Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in previously undiagnosed patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia resuscitated from sudden cardiac arrest

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Christian van der Werf
  • Krystien V Lieve
  • J Martijn Bos
  • Conor M Lane
  • Isabelle Denjoy
  • Ferran Roses-Noguer
  • Takeshi Aiba
  • Yuko Wada
  • Jodie Ingles
  • Ida S Leren
  • Boris Rudic
  • Peter J Schwartz
  • Alice Maltret
  • Frederic Sacher
  • Jonathan R Skinner
  • Andrew D Krahn
  • Thomas M Roston
  • Heikki Swan
  • Tomas Robyns
  • Seiko Ohno
  • Jason D Roberts
  • Maarten P van den Berg
  • Janneke A Kammeraad
  • Vincent Probst
  • Prince J Kannankeril
  • Nico A Blom
  • Elijah R Behr
  • Martin Borggrefe
  • Kristina H Haugaa
  • Christopher Semsarian
  • Minoru Horie
  • Wataru Shimizu
  • Janice A Till
  • Antoine Leenhardt
  • Michael J Ackerman
  • Arthur A Wilde

AIMS: In patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks are sometimes ineffective and may even trigger fatal electrical storms. We assessed the efficacy and complications of ICDs placed in patients with CPVT who presented with a sentinel event of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) while undiagnosed and therefore untreated.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 136 patients who presented with SCA and in whom CPVT was diagnosed subsequently, leading to the initiation of guideline-directed therapy, including β-blockers, flecainide, and/or left cardiac sympathetic denervation. An ICD was implanted in 79 patients (58.1%). The primary outcome of the study was sudden cardiac death (SCD). The secondary outcomes were composite outcomes of SCD, SCA, appropriate ICD shocks, and syncope. After a median follow-up of 4.8 years, SCD had occurred in three patients (3.8%) with an ICD and none of the patients without an ICD (P = 0.1). SCD, SCA, or appropriate ICD shocks occurred in 37 patients (46.8%) with an ICD and 9 patients (15.8%) without an ICD (P < 0.0001). Inappropriate ICD shocks occurred in 19 patients (24.7%) and other device-related complications in 22 patients (28.9%).

CONCLUSION: In previously undiagnosed patients with CPVT who presented with SCA, an ICD was not associated with improved survival. Instead, the ICD was associated with both a high rate of appropriate ICD shocks and inappropriate ICD shocks along with other device-related complications. Strict adherence to guideline-directed therapy without an ICD may provide adequate protection in these patients without all the potential disadvantages of an ICD.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean Heart Journal
Vol/bind40
Udgave nummer35
Sider (fra-til)2953–2961
ISSN0195-668X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 14 sep. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

ID: 225424816