Simple implementation of muscle tissue into routine workflow of blood analysis in forensic cases: A validated method for quantification of 29 drugs in postmortem blood and muscle samples by UHPLC-MS/MS

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Simple implementation of muscle tissue into routine workflow of blood analysis in forensic cases : A validated method for quantification of 29 drugs in postmortem blood and muscle samples by UHPLC-MS/MS. / Hansen, Stine Lund; Nielsen, Marie Katrine Klose; Linnet, Kristian; Rasmussen, Brian Schou.

I: Forensic Science International, Bind 325, 110901, 2021.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hansen, SL, Nielsen, MKK, Linnet, K & Rasmussen, BS 2021, 'Simple implementation of muscle tissue into routine workflow of blood analysis in forensic cases: A validated method for quantification of 29 drugs in postmortem blood and muscle samples by UHPLC-MS/MS', Forensic Science International, bind 325, 110901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110901

APA

Hansen, S. L., Nielsen, M. K. K., Linnet, K., & Rasmussen, B. S. (2021). Simple implementation of muscle tissue into routine workflow of blood analysis in forensic cases: A validated method for quantification of 29 drugs in postmortem blood and muscle samples by UHPLC-MS/MS. Forensic Science International, 325, [110901]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110901

Vancouver

Hansen SL, Nielsen MKK, Linnet K, Rasmussen BS. Simple implementation of muscle tissue into routine workflow of blood analysis in forensic cases: A validated method for quantification of 29 drugs in postmortem blood and muscle samples by UHPLC-MS/MS. Forensic Science International. 2021;325. 110901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110901

Author

Hansen, Stine Lund ; Nielsen, Marie Katrine Klose ; Linnet, Kristian ; Rasmussen, Brian Schou. / Simple implementation of muscle tissue into routine workflow of blood analysis in forensic cases : A validated method for quantification of 29 drugs in postmortem blood and muscle samples by UHPLC-MS/MS. I: Forensic Science International. 2021 ; Bind 325.

Bibtex

@article{7f73347041b74df389c2e96bb3e3631a,
title = "Simple implementation of muscle tissue into routine workflow of blood analysis in forensic cases: A validated method for quantification of 29 drugs in postmortem blood and muscle samples by UHPLC-MS/MS",
abstract = "Whole blood is most often the matrix of choice for postmortem analysis but it is not always available. In these cases, muscle tissue can be used as an alternative matrix. Therefore, an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of 29 drugs and metabolites of toxicological interest in postmortem muscle tissue was developed and validated. Additionally, a validation of whole blood was carried out to compare the results from the two matrices. Solid-phase extraction was performed by an automated robotic system to minimize manual labour and risk of human errors, and increase robustness, sample throughput and sample traceability. The method was validated in terms of selectivity, matrix effect, extraction recovery, process efficiency, measuring range, lower limit of quantification, carry-over, stability, precision and accuracy. To correct for any inter-individual variability in matrix effects on analyte accuracy and precision, deuterated analogues of each analyte were used as internal standards. The lower limit of quantification in both blood and muscle homogenate ranged between 0.002 and 0.005 mg/kg, while the upper limit of quantification spanned from 0.20 to 1.0 mg/kg. Corrected with the 4-fold dilution factor, the corresponding concentrations in muscle tissue were 0.008-0.02 mg/kg at the lower limit of quantification and 0.80-4.0 mg/kg at the upper limit of quantification. The method showed acceptable precision and accuracy, with precision below 12% and accuracies ranging from 87% to 115% at up to 6 levels for all analytes in both matrices. In addition, comparison between calibration standards in spiked muscle homogenate and spiked blood showed that analyte concentrations in muscle samples could be quantified by using spiked blood samples as calibration standards with acceptable precision and accuracy when using deuterated analogues as internal standards. The investigation of matrix effects showed no great difference between blood and homogenates of non-decomposed and decomposed muscle tissue for most analytes. In the samples where high ion suppression or enhancement was observed, the results were corrected by the internal standards. Statistical comparison of quality control samples in blood and muscle tissue showed no obvious differences, and therefore muscle tissue was included in the routine method for analysis of blood samples and used in autopsy cases where no blood was available. By adding a semi-automated homogenization step before the remaining automated sample preparation, muscle tissue samples were easily incorporated into the workflow of the existing routine method. The present method has been successfully implemented in routine analysis of blood and muscle tissue since 2019.",
author = "Hansen, {Stine Lund} and Nielsen, {Marie Katrine Klose} and Kristian Linnet and Rasmussen, {Brian Schou}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110901",
language = "English",
volume = "325",
journal = "Forensic Science International",
issn = "0379-0738",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simple implementation of muscle tissue into routine workflow of blood analysis in forensic cases

T2 - A validated method for quantification of 29 drugs in postmortem blood and muscle samples by UHPLC-MS/MS

AU - Hansen, Stine Lund

AU - Nielsen, Marie Katrine Klose

AU - Linnet, Kristian

AU - Rasmussen, Brian Schou

N1 - Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Whole blood is most often the matrix of choice for postmortem analysis but it is not always available. In these cases, muscle tissue can be used as an alternative matrix. Therefore, an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of 29 drugs and metabolites of toxicological interest in postmortem muscle tissue was developed and validated. Additionally, a validation of whole blood was carried out to compare the results from the two matrices. Solid-phase extraction was performed by an automated robotic system to minimize manual labour and risk of human errors, and increase robustness, sample throughput and sample traceability. The method was validated in terms of selectivity, matrix effect, extraction recovery, process efficiency, measuring range, lower limit of quantification, carry-over, stability, precision and accuracy. To correct for any inter-individual variability in matrix effects on analyte accuracy and precision, deuterated analogues of each analyte were used as internal standards. The lower limit of quantification in both blood and muscle homogenate ranged between 0.002 and 0.005 mg/kg, while the upper limit of quantification spanned from 0.20 to 1.0 mg/kg. Corrected with the 4-fold dilution factor, the corresponding concentrations in muscle tissue were 0.008-0.02 mg/kg at the lower limit of quantification and 0.80-4.0 mg/kg at the upper limit of quantification. The method showed acceptable precision and accuracy, with precision below 12% and accuracies ranging from 87% to 115% at up to 6 levels for all analytes in both matrices. In addition, comparison between calibration standards in spiked muscle homogenate and spiked blood showed that analyte concentrations in muscle samples could be quantified by using spiked blood samples as calibration standards with acceptable precision and accuracy when using deuterated analogues as internal standards. The investigation of matrix effects showed no great difference between blood and homogenates of non-decomposed and decomposed muscle tissue for most analytes. In the samples where high ion suppression or enhancement was observed, the results were corrected by the internal standards. Statistical comparison of quality control samples in blood and muscle tissue showed no obvious differences, and therefore muscle tissue was included in the routine method for analysis of blood samples and used in autopsy cases where no blood was available. By adding a semi-automated homogenization step before the remaining automated sample preparation, muscle tissue samples were easily incorporated into the workflow of the existing routine method. The present method has been successfully implemented in routine analysis of blood and muscle tissue since 2019.

AB - Whole blood is most often the matrix of choice for postmortem analysis but it is not always available. In these cases, muscle tissue can be used as an alternative matrix. Therefore, an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of 29 drugs and metabolites of toxicological interest in postmortem muscle tissue was developed and validated. Additionally, a validation of whole blood was carried out to compare the results from the two matrices. Solid-phase extraction was performed by an automated robotic system to minimize manual labour and risk of human errors, and increase robustness, sample throughput and sample traceability. The method was validated in terms of selectivity, matrix effect, extraction recovery, process efficiency, measuring range, lower limit of quantification, carry-over, stability, precision and accuracy. To correct for any inter-individual variability in matrix effects on analyte accuracy and precision, deuterated analogues of each analyte were used as internal standards. The lower limit of quantification in both blood and muscle homogenate ranged between 0.002 and 0.005 mg/kg, while the upper limit of quantification spanned from 0.20 to 1.0 mg/kg. Corrected with the 4-fold dilution factor, the corresponding concentrations in muscle tissue were 0.008-0.02 mg/kg at the lower limit of quantification and 0.80-4.0 mg/kg at the upper limit of quantification. The method showed acceptable precision and accuracy, with precision below 12% and accuracies ranging from 87% to 115% at up to 6 levels for all analytes in both matrices. In addition, comparison between calibration standards in spiked muscle homogenate and spiked blood showed that analyte concentrations in muscle samples could be quantified by using spiked blood samples as calibration standards with acceptable precision and accuracy when using deuterated analogues as internal standards. The investigation of matrix effects showed no great difference between blood and homogenates of non-decomposed and decomposed muscle tissue for most analytes. In the samples where high ion suppression or enhancement was observed, the results were corrected by the internal standards. Statistical comparison of quality control samples in blood and muscle tissue showed no obvious differences, and therefore muscle tissue was included in the routine method for analysis of blood samples and used in autopsy cases where no blood was available. By adding a semi-automated homogenization step before the remaining automated sample preparation, muscle tissue samples were easily incorporated into the workflow of the existing routine method. The present method has been successfully implemented in routine analysis of blood and muscle tissue since 2019.

U2 - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110901

DO - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110901

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34245938

VL - 325

JO - Forensic Science International

JF - Forensic Science International

SN - 0379-0738

M1 - 110901

ER -

ID: 274069787